Miz
Full Member
Roflcopter!!1
Posts: 597
|
Post by Miz on May 8, 2005 4:04:01 GMT -5
What monster is the toughest? As much as I love Zombies, I'll have to go with Werewolves. They only have one known weakness, and that is silver. Plus, they're super fast, super strong, super agile, and are far more intelligent than the zombies. The shuffling dead ain't got nothing on them.
Vampires, meanwhile, are total wimps. A gentle push could kill them, or at least keep them at bay.
|
|
|
Post by BoyGenius on May 8, 2005 12:19:48 GMT -5
i am going to have to go with vampires on this on. zombies just suck in general they are cool but worthless you know? i have never really incountered a warewolf but in a move or anything so vampires are better than zombies....
|
|
Jaz
Junior Member
Posts: 75
|
Post by Jaz on May 8, 2005 12:52:09 GMT -5
I'de have to go with Vampires on this one. Don't get me wrong, zombies are cool. However their undead bodies don't tend to allow maximum mobility. And I've never personally been a big fan of werewolves. Vampires though, their quick, then can turn into bats when they need to, and they drink people's blood. Plus.. they tend to be slightly be better looking then zombies or werewolves.... What can I say? I'm vain.
|
|
Miz
Full Member
Roflcopter!!1
Posts: 597
|
Post by Miz on May 9, 2005 0:28:12 GMT -5
Vampires really are wimps. though. They've got a billion weaknesses (anything holy, garlic flowers, sunlight), and they can't cross water or come into your house uninvited. The only thing they've got going for them is the ability to control wolves.
|
|
Professor K
Administrator
I just wanna create
Posts: 1,545
|
Post by Professor K on May 11, 2005 21:10:06 GMT -5
Definately Vampires. THey clean the floor with all the other ones. Werewolves are stupid, and Zombies... while cool simply cannot take on vampires. I mean.... look at Dracula.
|
|
|
Post by speedingbullet on May 15, 2005 22:18:30 GMT -5
Vampires, sure they have more weaknesses than were wolves, but a few of them only have one (take blade for example) also vampires have super stengh and can regenerate.
also were did you get that they cant come to your houses uninvited? Vampires dont have THAT many weaknesses, the only ones I know of are sunlight, silver, garlic, holy water, and the wooden stake through the heart, if you think vampires are wimps you HAVE NOT watched any of the blade movies.
|
|
Miz
Full Member
Roflcopter!!1
Posts: 597
|
Post by Miz on May 18, 2005 0:56:12 GMT -5
Vampires, sure they have more weaknesses than were wolves, but a few of them only have one (take blade for example) also vampires have super stengh and can regenerate. also were did you get that they cant come to your houses uninvited? Vampires dont have THAT many weaknesses, the only ones I know of are sunlight, silver, garlic, holy water, and the wooden stake through the heart, if you think vampires are wimps you HAVE NOT watched any of the blade movies. No, but I HAVE read Bram Sroker's "Dracula", the granddaddy of all vampire stories. Every single weakness I listed can be found in that book. As far as I'm concerned, only the originals count. If I thought that movies and books beyond the original counted for anything, I would have voted for vampires because nothing beats Alucard, or zombies because the undead in "Damn of the Dead" are on the high end of unstoppable. The people who created these stories did not create the monster. Making fact of what the current movies and books say is almost like accepting fan fiction as a true storyline.
|
|
dynasty99
Senior Member
oh ya! eat it newb!
Posts: 1,461
|
Post by dynasty99 on May 18, 2005 20:24:16 GMT -5
btw the voice of dracula we now know (I vant to suck your bloood) was unintented. An actor they used (the first) for dracula did not speak english, he just innunciated what they told him to say so it sounded wack, but good, so they kept it.
Zombies strike in mass and are never truly defeated, so I think they win.
|
|
Professor K
Administrator
I just wanna create
Posts: 1,545
|
Post by Professor K on May 25, 2005 21:05:13 GMT -5
zombies can be truely defeated. "by striking the head, or removing the brain"
|
|
Miz
Full Member
Roflcopter!!1
Posts: 597
|
Post by Miz on Jun 11, 2005 6:06:24 GMT -5
Or Napalm. Lots of Napalm.
|
|
Skinny
Global Moderator
This is the art of ruin
Posts: 468
|
Post by Skinny on Jun 11, 2005 17:43:58 GMT -5
yeah but when you remove one zombie, there's always another one.
|
|
Jaz
Junior Member
Posts: 75
|
Post by Jaz on Jun 11, 2005 17:57:54 GMT -5
But not due to their own merit. At least a vampire can choose to bite another person and another vampire arises. They do that on purpose. With Zombies, it's no credit to them that there is always another one. That just means there are a hell of alot of them.
|
|
dynasty99
Senior Member
oh ya! eat it newb!
Posts: 1,461
|
Post by dynasty99 on Jun 12, 2005 12:47:48 GMT -5
yeah but when you remove one zombie, there's always another one. thats what I went, you cant destroy zombies in entirety, there will always be more.
|
|
|
Post by Teej a.k.a T-Dj on Jun 12, 2005 14:03:46 GMT -5
Those damn zombies. These days you have to take your semi-automatic around Ottawa, there's so many of them, and they're always where you least expect them.
|
|
|
Post by speedingbullet on Jun 30, 2005 23:46:55 GMT -5
sure the original vampires were kinda wimpy, but blade was a freaking awsome one, and so were his enemies. so why exactly do only the originals count? whats wrong with a vamire that dosnt havwe all those weaknesses, like blade, he only has the thirst, unlike the guys hes fighting against to protect the human race. sorry about the big picture doesnt he look cool?
|
|